Dr. Layton Seeks Access to SEC’s Ripple Docs: EMPOWR Supports Motion

• Forbes journalist Dr. Roslyn Layton is seeking public access to the Hinman speech documents related to the SEC’s lawsuit against Ripple Labs.
• Empower Oversight Whistleblowers & Research (EMPOWR) has expressed its support for the motion to unseal the Hinman docs.
• The case will serve as a legal referendum on the SEC’s system of regulation in regard to cryptocurrencies.

Support for Motion To Intervene In Ripple Lawsuit

Forbes journalist Dr. Roslyn Layton is receiving support for her motion to intervene in the lawsuit between Ripple Labs and the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC). The goal of this intervention is to gain public access to documents related to Hinman’s speech, which could provide insight into conflicts of interest with cryptocurrency cases handled by the agency.

Empower Oversight Whistleblowers & Research

Empower Oversight Whistleblowers & Research (EMPOWR), a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization that works to improve independent oversight of government and corporate misconduct, has expressed its support for Dr. Layton’s motion. They have also filed an opposition to the SEC’s motion for summary judgement in a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the SEC over documents pertaining to potential conflicts of interest with cryptocurrency cases.

Importance Of The Hinman Docs In The Ripple Case

The Hinman Documents are important because they could provide insight into what exactly was known about his speech and when it was known by regulators at the SEC. This information could prove or disprove allegations that there were conflicts of interest at play when dealing with cryptocurrency cases handled by the agency, thus providing clarity around possible regulatory action taken against companies like Ripple Labs.

Potential Impact On Cryptocurrencies In US

The outcome of this case could determine how cryptocurrencies are regulated in the United States going forward, as well as set a precedent regarding transparency from governmental agencies like the SEC when handling similar cases in future scenarios. As such, it is critical that these documents be made available so that all interested parties can form their own conclusions based on their contents, rather than relying solely upon claims made by either side involved in this dispute.


The ripple case against the SEC carries significant weight not only due to its potential impact on cryptocurrencies within US borders, but also because it serves as a test-case regarding transparency from governmental agencies like them when dealing with similar issues moving forward. With organizations like EMPOWR backing Dr Layton’s motion to intervene and gain access to key evidence in this dispute, there may yet be hope for those looking for more clarity about what transpired behind closed doors leading up this ongoing legal battle